Hayz Labs · https://hayzlabs.com/reviews/makers/anthropic/
makers · Anthropic
Anthropic
Everything from Anthropic we track, and our call on each. Its strongest is Claude Opus 5.5 for agents.
- Scored
- 6
- First looks
- 1
- On the list
- 0
- Passed on
- 0
This product is made by Anthropic, whose Claude models help draft our reviews.
Reviewed
Best score first; each shows its best job. First looks are new and not scored yet.
| Name | Score | Cheapest plan | Our verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 5.5AI model · best at agents | #1Agents | $20/mo | Use it | Top public pick for coding, agents and hard questions at a mid price; skip it for bulk work where Sonnet 5.5 is enough. |
Claude Fable 5.1AI model · best at agents | #3Agents | $100/mo | Skip | Very strong, but Opus 5.5 ranks higher on most boards for 40% of the price; keep Fable for cases Opus misses. |
Claude Sonnet 5.5AI model · best at agents | #5Agents | Free | Use it | Near-top coding, agents and research for half Opus 5.5's token price; for writing, pick Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash. |
| 80Coding | Free | Worth trying | Free runs Sonnet 5.5, near the top for coding and hard questions. Pay for Pro for agents and for writing with Opus 5.5. | |
Claude CodeDeveloper tool · best at coding | 70Coding | $20/mo | Worth trying | Highest published score on a coding-agent test, from $20/month; OpenAI's Codex scores close for far less per task. |
Claude Haiku 5.5AI model · best at coding | 44Coding | Pay as you go | Worth trying | Very cheap small model for summaries, sorting and coding subagents; use Sonnet 5.5 for hard coding work. |
Claude Mythos 5.1AI model | Not scored yet | Pay as you go | First look: Wait | Anthropic's top cyber and biology model, open only to vetted groups. Most people should use Opus 5.5. |