Hayz Labs

Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS

GoogleAI modelReleased 22 SeptOfficial site for Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS no referral link

Near-top AI voices for less than half the price of ElevenLabs, with a free tier. Prices double on 1 Jan 2027.

Our callUse itChecked 11 Oct
ScoreNo score yetVoice: why there is no number
CostFreeNothing to pay
Better optionNothing we scored beats it for voice

Should you use it?

Pick it if

Developers adding narration or read-aloud to apps who need natural voices at volume on a budget.

Best for: Narration or read-aloud in apps at volume, in over 130 languages (Voice models Top 20)

Skip it if

You want the single most natural voice and price is secondary; Eleven v4 Turbo ranks first.

You give up: Ranks below both Eleven v4 models; free tier inputs are used to improve Google products

The short version

What this is
Google's text to speech model in the Gemini API. It turns text into natural speech in over 130 languages, with style control and two-speaker dialogue.
Why it matters
It gets close to the best AI voices in blind tests for less than half the price of the leader.
  • 5th of 96 on the Artificial Analysis speech arena; no score yet, as its terms stop us publishing one.
  • $16.50 per 1M characters on Artificial Analysis; free tier available.
  • Paid prices double on 1 Jan 2027, so budget for that.

Good at

  • 5th of 96 in Artificial Analysis's blind listening arena, at $16.50 per 1M characters, against $40 for Eleven v4 Turbo and $80 for Eleven v4 s1.
  • Over 130 languages detected automatically, 30 prebuilt voices plus hundreds more in an extended library, says Google s3.
  • Two-speaker dialogue and style control over emotion and pace in one request s3.

Weak at

  • Below both Eleven v4 models and Qwen-Audio-3.1-TTS-Plus in the arena s1.
  • Google's paid prices double on 1 Jan 2027 s2.
  • Free tier inputs are used to improve Google products s2.

Our take

Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS, generally available since 22 Sep 2026 s4, is the value pick in text to speech among the voices we review. Listeners in Artificial Analysis's blind arena place it 5th of 96, a step behind the two Eleven v4 models, at $16.50 per 1M characters against $40 and $80 s1.

Two things to plan for. Google's paid prices double on 1 Jan 2027, which roughly doubles its cost per character s2. And the free tier's inputs are used to improve Google products, so use the paid tier for private scripts s2.

Score

A score from 0 to 100 per job, against everything available today.

New to this? What the scores and labels mean
0 to 100
Our score for one job, like writing or coding, compared with everything else out today. 100 is the best available today. For AI models we build it from public data, such as Arena's blind votes and Epoch AI's independent tests; apps and tools are scored on our own checklist. The same tool can score differently for different jobs, and where two likely ranges overlap, we call it a tie.
Our verdict
Use it: a top choice for most people. Worth trying: good, and worth a go. Depends: good for some people or one kind of job. Wait: too early to tell, or not out for everyone yet. Skip: something else does the job better.
First look
Just released. We say what it is and whether to bother, and give it a score once public results exist.
No score yet
None of the public sources we use covers it yet, or the only evidence is from a source whose numbers we can't use, so we describe it in words instead.
Best buy
Nothing cheaper scores as well for that job.
Best free
The best score for that job that costs nothing, through a free plan or by running on your own computer.
Pay as you go
No monthly plan: you pay for each use, usually through a developer account.
Checked
The day we last confirmed the score and the price against the sources. Prices change often, so check the date.
AI model
The engine underneath, like GPT or Claude. You use it through an app or, if you code, directly.
Open source
Free to download and run on your own computer, so nothing leaves your machine.
How we score, in full
–No score yet

Voice and audio

No score yet. The leaderboard this rests on does not let us publish numbers from it, so we describe the evidence instead.

1 source so far

Public leaderboardArtificial Analysis text to speech arena rank 5 of 96, range 4 to 6, Elo 1272, 2,677 samples s1. The range does not include 1. No independent eval to adjust with.

Alternatives

Nothing we have scored beats it for voice on score or on price.

Compare side by side →

Evidence

Everything behind the call and the scores, folded so the page stays short. Spotted a wrong price, score or link? Report a mistake.

How we scored this

Voice has no score yet, because none of the public sources we use covers it.

Public leaderboard

Reviews are drafted with help from AI models, including Anthropic's Claude. Model scores come only from outside leaderboards and independent evaluations, by a written rule.

No one paid for this review or gave us free access, and we earn nothing if you sign up. How we score

Sources 4
  1. s1Artificial Analysis text to speech leaderboard
  2. s2Gemini API pricing
  3. s3Gemini API docs: speech generation
  4. s4Gemini API changelog

Something here out of date or wrong? Report a mistake and we will check it against the source.

History 2 changes

Every change to a rating, the price or our call, with the reason. Scores are against what exists on the day, so they drift down as better things ship. Older entries come from before we moved to scores.

  1. New: Voice ratedReviewed: voice.
  2. Audit: 'well under half' corrected to 'less than half' ($16.50 against $40 is 41%). Added Flash-Lite TTS, the same rating for less, as an alternative. Rating unchanged.
Use it well 4 guides on this site
esc
↑↓ move↵ openesc closeType a product, a job or a question

Keyboard shortcuts

CtrlK
search everything
/
search everything
gr
reviews: all AI, scored
gg
start here
gu
guides
gw
step-by-step workflows
gt
try-it tools
gs
setup
ga
about
[ ]
previous and next entry, or collection
t
theme: auto, light, dark
?
this sheet